Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450389›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Accuracy of First-Line Tests for Posterior Circulation Stroke in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

William Huang, Matteo Pieri, Nicholas Stanciu, Aditya Loganathan, Andrew Meltzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William HuangEmergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA.
Matteo PieriEmergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA.
Nicholas StanciuEmergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA.
Aditya LoganathanEmergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA.
Andrew MeltzerEmergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posterior circulation stroke (PCS) presents a high-risk diagnostic challenge in the emergency department (ED) due to its nonspecific symptoms and frequent overlap with benign vestibular conditions. Accurate, rapid identification is essential but often elusive. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of six bedside tools commonly used to detect PCS in the ED: clinical HINTS (head impulse, nystagmus, test of skew) examination (cHINTS); video-oculography HINTS (vHINTS); HINTS Plus (HINTS+); early MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI); ABCD2 (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms, diabetes status) score and the Gait-Truncal Instability (GTI) test. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we systematically searched PubMed and Scopus for studies reporting accuracy data on these tests in patients presenting with suspected PCS or acute vestibular syndrome (AVS). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts. Extracted data included study design, diagnostic modality, clinician expertise, and sensitivity/specificity metrics. Of 106 initial studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Most (82%) were published between 2020 and 2024 and included 16 prospective studies, 4 retrospective studies, 1 case series, and 1 randomized comparison. Accuracy data were reported for cHINTS (n=16), vHINTS (n=9), HINTS+ (n=3), MRI-DWI (n=2), ABCD2 (n=3), and GTI (n=3). Reported sensitivities and specificities varied widely across tools. Notably, 71% of HINTS-based exams were performed by neurologists or neuro-otologists. While cHINTS, HINTS+, and MRI-DWI demonstrate high sensitivity in selected settings, real-world performance in EDs is inconsistent and likely limited by variable clinician training and study methodology. These findings highlight the urgent need for pragmatic, ED-appropriate diagnostic pathways validated in frontline care environments.

Indexed as

avs (acute vestibular syndrome)dizzinessemergency departmenthints (head impulse nystagmus test of skew)mripcs (posterior circulation stroke)

Identifiers

PMID41450389
PMCPMC12728094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.