ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy and Outcomes of the Hormone-Releasing Levonorgestrel-Intrauterine System for Adenomyosis Treatment.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment selection for adenomyosis based on imaging findings and patient characteristics.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Adenomyosis refers to the presence of endometrial tissues within the uterine myometrium. The main presenting features are dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), and chronic pelvic pain (CPP). With an increasing prevalence, symptomatic management is becoming more necessary. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of symptomatic relief and possible causes of failure six months after levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion. Methodology This prospective, observational study was conducted over six months involving 110 patients who underwent LNG-IUS intrauterine insertion at a tertiary healthcare center and met the eligibility criteria. Pain assessment was performed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). HMB was assessed using the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart, and possible causes of failure were analyzed based on uterocervical length (UCL) and uterine volume measurements. Results The VAS score before and six months after insertion of LNG-IUS was from 5.54 ± 3.10 to 1.37 ± 2.53 for dysmenorrhea, 1.75 ± 2.57 to 0.50 ± 1.57 for dyspareunia, and 1.58 ± 2.24 to 0.76 ± 1.99 for CPP. Blood loss assessment (in mL) before and after insertion was 66.73 ± 36.82 to 4.86 ± 12.88. All four assessments had p-values <0.001 and were significant. Those with significantly increased UCL and increased uterine volume had a cumulative displacement or expulsion rate of 4.54%. Conclusions This study demonstrated that LNG-IUS is highly effective in providing symptomatic relief to patients with adenomyosis. The overall satisfactory rate was 87.3%, and the failed outcome rate was 10.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.