ArticleCureus2025
Pause the Draws: A Quality Improvement Project to Minimize Unnecessary Liver Function Tests in a Small District General Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Blood tests are essential for diagnosis and monitoring in hospital settings, yet many are performed without clear clinical benefit. Unnecessary blood testing can negatively affect patients by prolonging hospital stays, disrupting sleep, and prompting further investigations that may not be needed, while also adding avoidable financial costs and carbon emissions. This quality improvement project focused on reducing inappropriate liver function tests (LFTs) in two medical wards, following the Royal College of Pathology (RCPath) guidelines, with the aim of halving the proportion of inappropriate tests. Our initial audit identified that 28% of LFTs performed on the wards were unnecessary, demonstrating a clear opportunity for improvement. Methods The extent and causes of unnecessary LFTs were identified across two medical wards. Following the RCPath guidelines, any LFT repeated within 72 hours of a previous test was considered inappropriate unless an exclusion criterion applied. Interventions were implemented over four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Weekly data were collected on the total and inappropriate number of LFTs for every patient present on the wards on Fridays. For each inappropriate LFT, the request information was reviewed to assess the rationale and inform subsequent PDSA cycles. Results Across the four PDSA cycles, inappropriate LFTs decreased from 72 out of 257 (28.0%) to 18 out of 98 (18.4%). The weekly LFT carbon footprint decreased from 263.34 kgCO₂e to 83.2 kgCO₂e. The weekly cost of unnecessary LFTs was reduced from £140.79 to £44.46. Conclusions The reduction of inappropriate LFTs yielded measurable clinical, environmental, and financial benefits. Patients avoided unnecessary blood tests that could complicate or prolong their admissions. Cost savings were demonstrated, and the hospital's carbon footprint was reduced. The project's impact, achieved through simple and practical interventions, highlights that physician education is central to optimizing blood testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.