Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450369›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Jejunogastric Invagination Complicated With Intestinal Necrosis.

Pedro Nel Montoya Restrepo, Daniela Gomez, Luisa Meza Botero, Ana Fernanda Muñoz Durán, Leidy Aguirre

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro Nel Montoya RestrepoRadiology, Hospital Manuel Uribe Angel, Envigado, COL.
Daniela GomezGeneral Medicine, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales, COL.
Luisa Meza BoteroGeneral Medicine, Manizales University, Manizales, COL.
Ana Fernanda Muñoz DuránGeneral Medicine, Fundación Universitaria San Martín, Sabaneta, COL.
Leidy AguirreGeneral Practice, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, COL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jejunogastric intussusception (JGI) is an uncommon complication of gastric surgery. Its causes are varied, and it is classified as acute or chronic depending on the time of onset. The clinical presentation is usually nonspecific, with symptoms such as epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting (with or without blood), and signs of upper gastrointestinal obstruction, which can be mistaken for neoplastic disease or peptic ulcer disease. The diagnosis is established by endoscopy or radiology, with computed tomography (CT) being particularly useful for defining the site of intussusception by demonstrating the typical findings of a target or pseudokidney appearance, as well as for quickly defining the extent and complications. Treatment usually requires urgent surgery to reduce the intestinal intussusception, assess the viability of the intestine, and, if necessary, perform an intestinal resection. Surgical outcomes depend on the duration of the condition, with a reported mortality rate of 5%-50% if treatment is delayed for more than 48 hours, a recurrence rate of up to 10% if the cause is not corrected, and prolonged hospital stays with extensive intestinal resections. We present a case of a patient with an unclear history of surgery for a perforated peptic ulcer complicated by JGI and intestinal ischemia.

Indexed as

bowel ischemiadigestive surgerygastric complicationsjejunal intussusceptionsmall bowel necrosis

Identifiers

PMID41450369
PMCPMC12730444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.