ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Reassessing the cryopreserved human amniotic membrane's low immunogenicity due to advances in histocompatibility.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances on anti-scarring properties of amniotic membrane: emerging strategies and clinical potentials in regenerative medicine.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Minimal immune response after transplantation of a cryopreserved human amniotic membrane on the ocular surface.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Rolled amniotic membrane for practical vascular graft development: a scoping review.Human cell · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human amniotic membrane (hAM) is a biocompatible scaffold with suitable mechanical properties (permeability, stability, elasticity, flexibility, resorbability and transparency), that is rich in stem cells and growth factors and is used for tissue repair and regenerative processes. It is routinely used in ocular surgery as it promotes epithelialization, supports cell adhesion and proliferation, and enhances wound healing. It exhibits both immunomodulatory and immunoregulatory properties, contributing to its anti-inflammatory and low immunogenicity risk profile. hAM transplantation is considered unlikely to trigger an immune response against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and is generally regarded as minimally or non-immunogenic. This conclusion is primarily based on clinical observations, and a single study published 40 years ago that investigated subcutaneous hAM grafting-a procedure that does not reflect current clinical applications. Since then, there has been no laboratory evidence that hAM transplantation is immunologically safe. Notably, the production of anti-HLA antibodies following hAM transplantation has not been investigated, despite the tremendous improvements in the sensitivity of detection techniques. The recent application of hAM to more vascularized areas could raise concerns about potential immune responses. In this perspective paper, we summarize the limited and sometimes contradictory data regarding hAM immunogenicity. Then, we describe the methods we use to assess whether immune responses are triggered after hAM grafting in current clinical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.