Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41450335›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

Reassessing the cryopreserved human amniotic membrane's low immunogenicity due to advances in histocompatibility.

Jean-Baptiste Baudey, Lauriana Solecki, Christophe Picard, Pascal Pedini, Bastien Mathéaud, Alain Coaquette, Isabelle Jollet, Pauline Jamain, Lucas Hubert, Adeline Desanlis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jean-Baptiste BaudeyÉtablissement Français du Sang Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur-Corse, Laboratoire d'immunogénétique, F-13005, Marseille, France.
Lauriana SoleckiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Service d'Ophtalmologie, F-25000, Besançon, France.
Christophe PicardÉtablissement Français du Sang Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur-Corse, Laboratoire d'immunogénétique, F-13005, Marseille, France.
Pascal PediniÉtablissement Français du Sang Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur-Corse, Laboratoire d'immunogénétique, F-13005, Marseille, France.
Bastien MathéaudCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Service d'Ophtalmologie, F-25000, Besançon, France.
Alain CoaquetteCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Service de virologie, F-25000, Besançon, France.
Isabelle JolletÉtablissement Français du Sang Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, F-86012, Poitiers, France.
Pauline JamainÉtablissement Français du Sang Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, F-86012, Poitiers, France.
Lucas HubertÉtablissement Français du Sang Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur-Corse, Laboratoire d'immunogénétique, F-13005, Marseille, France.
Adeline DesanlisÉtablissement Français du Sang Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Activité d'ingénierie cellulaire et tissulaire, F-25000, Besançon, France.
Xavier LafargeÉtablissement Français du Sang Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Laboratoire d'ingénierie tissulaire et cellulaire, F-33075, Bordeaux, France.
Florelle GindrauxCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Service d'Ophtalmologie, F-25000, Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) is a biocompatible scaffold with suitable mechanical properties (permeability, stability, elasticity, flexibility, resorbability and transparency), that is rich in stem cells and growth factors and is used for tissue repair and regenerative processes. It is routinely used in ocular surgery as it promotes epithelialization, supports cell adhesion and proliferation, and enhances wound healing. It exhibits both immunomodulatory and immunoregulatory properties, contributing to its anti-inflammatory and low immunogenicity risk profile. hAM transplantation is considered unlikely to trigger an immune response against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and is generally regarded as minimally or non-immunogenic. This conclusion is primarily based on clinical observations, and a single study published 40 years ago that investigated subcutaneous hAM grafting-a procedure that does not reflect current clinical applications. Since then, there has been no laboratory evidence that hAM transplantation is immunologically safe. Notably, the production of anti-HLA antibodies following hAM transplantation has not been investigated, despite the tremendous improvements in the sensitivity of detection techniques. The recent application of hAM to more vascularized areas could raise concerns about potential immune responses. In this perspective paper, we summarize the limited and sometimes contradictory data regarding hAM immunogenicity. Then, we describe the methods we use to assess whether immune responses are triggered after hAM grafting in current clinical indications.

Indexed as

Biological scaffoldHLAHuman amniotic membraneImmunogenicityLuminexMAIPA

Identifiers

PMID41450335
PMCPMC12731292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.