ArticlePersonality and mental health2026
DSM-5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form.
Article in Personality and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DSM-5 Functional Framework: Structure and Psychopathological Correlates of the DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in the Level of Personality Functioning (LPF), defined by Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD), is growing. LPF includes self-functioning (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal functioning (empathy, intimacy). While LPF is crucial for understanding personality dysfunction, its ability to distinguish personality disorders from other conditions remains debated. The DSM-5 Levels of Functioning Questionnaire-Short Form (DLOPFQ-SF) is a promising LPF measure, but further research in diverse populations is needed. This study examined the internal structure and psychopathological correlates of the DLOPFQ-SF in an Italian nonclinical sample. Specifically, it assessed the tool's factor structure and relations with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) and positive adjustment. A sample of 1183 Italian participants (46.2% female, mean age = 31.3 ± 14.8) completed the DLOPFQ-SF and other self-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a three-factor structure comprising Identity, Empathy, and Intimacy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) explored links between the three DLOPFQ-SF dimensions, HiTOP dimensions (internalizing, externalizing-antisocial, antagonism, detachment, psychoticism), and positive adjustment. In general, SEM analyses showed that higher LPF scores were associated with increased psychopathology and reduced well-being. The three subscales demonstrated specific links to distinct psychopathological outcomes, thereby supporting the construct validity of the DLOPFQ-SF. Despite the removal of the Self-Direction scale, the instrument proved useful in capturing key aspects of LPF across self and interpersonal domains, reinforcing its relevance within a dimensional model of psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.