ArticleBioethics2026
'Out of My Hands': Palestinian Referral Care in East Jerusalem After October 7, 2023.
Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gaza and the Responsibilities of Bioethics.Bioethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper examines the moral experiences of Palestinian healthcare professionals working at a specialised referral hospital in East Jerusalem during the early months of the Gaza War. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with hospital staff providing oncology care, it analyses how understandings of what constitutes "good" care in a context of occupation, segregation, and genocidal violence are shaped by competing normative frameworks. Three ethical perspectives initially emerged: medical ethics, which prioritises evidence-based protocols; humanitarian ethics, which emphasises neutrality in line with donor requirements; and communitarian ethics, which understands care as an expression of solidarity and national duty. The paper argues that to fully capture the moral labour of healthcare workers, a fourth frame is needed: care ethics, which highlights the relational and reparative dimensions of care work. This perspective is crucial in a context where occupation and segregation deeply affect the "care triangle" of patients, companions, and healthcare providers. Viewing care as a relational practice that resists division and exclusion also offers a strategy to alleviate the moral distress that can arise when professionals are unable to provide care they themselves see as "good enough." The paper calls on employers, communities, and colleagues to value and support the care work professionals provide beyond their clinical tasks, while also recognising the limits of individual responsibility by acknowledging and addressing the structural barriers they face. Ultimately, an end to occupation and segregation remains the primary condition for enabling good care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.