ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Perspectives of early mobility in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit: an interpretive description study.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveEarly mobility after cardiac surgery in the intensive care unit improves patient outcomes, yet implementation by clinicians remains inconsistent. To inform interventions to increase adoption, this study sought to explore clinicians' perspectives on the definition of early mobility in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit and describe perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation.DesignThis qualitative study was guided by interpretive description.SettingA tertiary hospital that performs 1000 cardiac surgeries annually.ParticipantsA total of 26 clinicians, including nurses, physicians, healthcare aides, respiratory therapists, and physiotherapists, participated.Main MeasuresThe nine focus groups and four individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThree themes and 13 categories were created from the data: (1) Incongruent operationalization and conceptualization (across micro, meso, and macro levels), (2) uncertainty, and (3) inconsistency in mobilization practices. Themes were rooted in ambiguous definitions of "early" and "mobility," discrepancy between conceptualization and implementation of timing, varied interpretations of success, and perceived safety concerns. In addition, 4 barriers and 4 facilitators were identified and categorized into patient-care and clinician-related.ConclusionDeveloping early mobility protocols and education informed by clinicians may enhance its implementation in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Incorporating the perspectives of clinicians into early mobility protocol development is essential to support behaviour change and provide this beneficial care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.