Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449986›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2026

Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: Cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms.

Irene Yang, Russell Buchanan, Nisreen Al-Namnam, Xuan Li, Margaret Lucas, A Hamish R W Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irene YangVictoria Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-6787
Russell BuchananDepartment of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Nisreen Al-NamnamDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Xuan LiCentre for Medical & Industrial Ultrasonics, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK.
Margaret LucasCentre for Medical & Industrial Ultrasonics, James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, UK.
A Hamish R W SimpsonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procedural-related musculoskeletal pain is common among orthopaedic surgeons, often caused by the repetitive use of high-force bone-cutting tools. Ultrasonic cutting devices, which can operate with lower force, may help reduce this physical burden. In this study, three practising orthopaedic surgeons each performed two cuts on three fresh cortical bone samples, harvested from excised femoral necks from three patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. The study was conducted using an ultrasonic cutting device in a controlled yet clinically reflective environment. A novel setup captured real-time data on surgeon-related parameters, including vertical cutting force and vertical and horizontal cutting speed. Consistent with previous research, we confirmed that ultrasonic devices enable low force cutting (average 1.91 N). However, our findings revealed significant variability in how each surgeon interacted with the device - including how much force each surgeon applied, and how the device was manoeuvred which can influence device performance, thermal effects, and overall clinical outcomes. Given the critical importance of surgeon-related factors, our results highlight the need to understand how each surgeon interacts with these devices differently. This insight can inform training and device optimisation strategies; help translate bench testing results into effective clinical use and ultimately improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. Additionally, our findings support the potential benefits of integrating ultrasonic devices with robotic platforms to maintain consistent cutting parameters. Future research should investigate optimal cutting parameters, evaluate different blade profiles, assess result generalisability and compare outcomes before and after training or system enhancements.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesMechanical PhenomenaRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansbiomedical devicesbiomedical instrumentationimplants/prostheticsorthopaedic proceduresrobotic assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID41449986
PMCPMC12811504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.