ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in Early Gestation: A Scoping Review of Definitions and Diagnostic Approach.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) is defined by the implantation and development of a gestational sac inside a caesarean scar defect, but variations in classification systems and diagnostic criteria exist.
objectivesThis study aimed to systematically review the different criteria used in the medical literature to diagnose CSEP in the first trimester of pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar from September 1990 to January 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included prospective and retrospective observational studies published in English reporting on imaging criteria used to diagnose CSEP. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently reviewed retrieved articles and performed data extraction using a priori-developed data collection form. Findings were tabulated and synthesised in a narrative format. MAIN
resultsA total of 22 studies, involving 1749 CSEP cases, met the inclusion criteria. Diagnostic modalities varied, with eight different classification systems reported across 11 studies, with the remaining 11 studies not specifying a classification system. Histology was used as a reference standard in 59% (13/22), intraoperative features in 18% (4/22) and a combination of both in 23% of studies (5/22). Seventy-two percent of studies (13/18) that used histology as a reference standard did not provide specific histological criteria for diagnosing CSEP.
conclusionsThis review highlights the wide variability in diagnostic approaches, imaging criteria and classification systems used in the first-trimester diagnosis of CSEP. The absence of a universally accepted reference standard for CSEP diagnosis poses a major challenge for prospective studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.