ArticleFoot & ankle international2026
Investigating the Ossification and Fusion of the Fifth Metatarsal Apophysis Using Computed Tomography and Plain Radiography.
Article in Foot & ankle international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn understanding of the anatomical development of the fifth metatarsal apophysis is essential for clinical assessment and management of subadult patients presenting with lateral foot pain or oedema that worsens with activity. Despite the common occurrence of subadult lateral foot pain, current understanding of apophyseal development is constrained because of the reliance on plain radiography in the literature, resulting in simplistic descriptions of development. To overcome these limitations, this study aimed to investigate the development of the fifth metatarsal apophysis using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis, to provide novel morphologic descriptions and normative sex-specific age tables for each developmental stage in a contemporary Australian subadult population.
methodsDevelopment and fusion status of the apophysis was scored using a novel 5-stage scoring system on 295 multi-slice computed tomography scans (158 females, 137 males; 0-15 years of age) and 258 lateral, anteroposterior, and oblique radiographs (120 females, 138 males; 0-7 years of age) from the Queensland Children's Hospital.
resultsThe apophysis commenced ossification as early as 7 years for females and 8 years for males, initially appearing as a thin fleck of bone that elongated to form a crescent shape, with the proximal aspect being wider and extending more medially compared with the distal aspect. Apophyseal fusion demonstrated significant sexual dimorphism with fusion commencing at a mean age of 10.09 years for females and 12 years for males, with the earliest age of complete fusion observed at 9 years for females and 12 years for males.
conclusionThis cross-sectional study provides contemporary descriptive reference data for staging development of the fifth metatarsal apophysis and an updated account of its morphology. These observations may assist radiographic interpretation in adolescents; however, the study was not designed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy or clinical outcomes. Further clinical validation is needed before using these data to guide diagnosis or to reduce misclassification of fractures versus apophysitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.