ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Childhood exposure to second-hand smoke (SHS) and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal never smokers: the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondhand smoke and breast health awareness among Vietnamese American families in California: A mixed-methods study.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeither active smoking nor second-hand smoke (SHS) are established causes for breast cancer. We examined the association between daily SHS exposure at home during childhood and postmenopausal breast cancer risk among never smokers in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study.
methodsWe analyzed data from 24,261 never-smoking postmenopausal female MEC participants, aged 60–89 years in 2008–2012, when they provided information on SHS exposure during childhood in the forth questionnaire (QX4). We identified invasive breast cancer cases and tumour receptor status via linkage to the Hawaii and California Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program cancer registries through December 2019. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate age-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for race and ethnicity.
resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 7.8 years, we identified 709 incident, invasive breast cancer cases. Women reporting any childhood SHS exposure had a 17% higher risk (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.00–1.36) of breast cancer compared with those reporting no childhood exposure, after adjustment for age at QX4 and race and ethnicity. We found higher HRs for breast cancer for those exposed ≥ 3 h/day (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02–1.51), those exposed ≥ 18 years (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04–1.53), and those with the highest joint exposure (≥ 3 h/day & ≥18 years) (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.00–1.63). A trend test, with increasing integers from those not exposed to those most exposed, showed a dose response relationship between duration and breast cancer risk for all three associations (all Ptrend ≤0.03). The childhood SHS exposure and breast cancer risk association did not differ, (all Pheterogeneity ≥0.17), when we stratified on nine established breast cancer risk factors (year of birth, age at QX4, race and ethnicity, education years, age at menarche, parity status, BMI -, physical activity -, and alcohol consumption all at QX4).
conclusionsOur findings, in this diverse population, add prospective data that daily SHS exposure during childhood may increase the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Our results provide additional arguments to establish SHS as a cause of breast cancer and to implement smoking bans in public and private places, when children are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.