ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Digital screening of children with ASD: diagnostic accuracy of emotion recognition and visual preference tasks.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, there is a need to improve care for suspected autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cases, as the time between parents’ initial suspicion and an official clinical diagnosis can reach three years. New technologies for digital screening promise relief in addressing children’s difficulties in recognizing emotions and social attention. This study investigated the diagnostic validity of tablet-based screening to differentiate between children with and without ASD via emotion recognition and visual preference tasks involving prior calibration.
methodThis study involved 24 boys with ASD and a matched control group of 24 typically developing (TD) boys aged 6–11 years. Mixed logistic models were applied for the emotion recognition task, while mixed linear models were used for the visual preference task, along with decision trees for both tasks.
resultsThe results indicate significant group differences in recognizing the emotion “fear” and naming an example for “sadness”. The emotion recognition of fear and sadness was relevant to the decision tree to differentiate between the groups, with an accuracy of 81.25%, a sensitivity of 91.67%, and a specificity of 70.83%. For the visual preference task, no significant group differences were found between groups; however, significant differences emerged between social and non-social image stimuli. Gaze fixation and gaze changes in video stimuli were relevant to the decision tree to differentiate between the groups. The accuracy was 81.25%, with a sensitivity of 70.83% and specificity of 91.67%.
conclusionOverall, this study suggests that automated digital screening might provide support and relief to families and clinicians, as it can distinguish between children with and without ASD using a combination of selected emotion recognition and visual preference tasks. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.