ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Clinical outcomes and visual quality after implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses with mini-monovision design.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the clinical outcomes and visual quality following bilateral implantation of Vivity IOLs with mini-monovision.
methodsPatients who underwent sequential bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of Vivity EDOF IOLs at our institution were divided into two groups: Group A was designed with a myopic refraction of ≥ 0.5 D and < 1.0 D in the non-dominant eye, while the refractive target for the dominant eye was emmetropia. Group B exhibited emmetropic refractive targets bilaterally. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 month postoperatively included: monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), monocular objective visual quality, monocular and binocular uncorrected defocus curves, VF-14 score, Quality of Vision (QoV) score and patient satisfaction.
resultsThe study comprised a total of 61 patients (122 eyes). Statistically significant differences were not observed between the groups in terms of UDVA, UIVA, mean modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio (SR), aberrations, VF-14 scores, QoV scores and satisfaction. In Group A, the UNVA of the non-dominant eye was superior to that of Group B (0.36 ± 0.05 vs. 0.54 ± 0.06 LogMAR, P=0.024). The defocus curve of the non-dominant eye revealed that Group A attained superior visual performance at defocus levels ranging from - 2.0D to -3.5D (0.50 m to 0.29 m). However, these differences did not achieve statistical significance.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that bilateral implantation of EDOF IOLs with a mini-monovision design improves near visual acuity without significantly compromising distance visual acuity, visual quality or increasing aberrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.