ArticleBMC health services research2025
A different variant of economic exploitation in oncology practice: medical board applications in Türkiye.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe process of cancer evolving into a chronic disease creates a significant economic burden on social security and healthcare resources, with the increase in the elderly population. This study analyzes the changes in the medical board application patterns of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of possible economic exploitation (i.e., the intentional acquisition of financial or social resources) through abuse of the healthcare system.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from cancer patients who applied to a medical faculty hospital in Türkiye to obtain a medical board report during the pandemic period (March 11, 2020-March 10, 2021) and the pre-pandemic period (March 11, 2019-March 10, 2020).
resultsOf the 382 cancer patients in the study sample, 219 who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The rate of stage 4 diseases (p = 0.026), the rate of not being in remission (p = 0.043), the rate of partial dependency (p = 0.046) and the rate of medical board application being made by a relative on behalf of the patient (p = 0.030) were higher in medical board applications during the pandemic period. Receiving social care benefits and taking advantage of exemptions from special consumption tax were more common reasons for medical board applications during the pandemic period (p = 0.001).
conclusionsThe primary limitation is the retrospective design, which prevents the definitive confirmation of exploitative intent and introduces a potential for interpretative bias. Although it is essential for cancer patients and their relatives to exercise the social rights provided to them to relieve their burden related to the disease, our findings indicate that the pandemic may further exacerbate existing weaknesses in the system. Legislators and health practitioners should strengthen control mechanisms in terms of both ethical processes and sustainability of healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.