ArticleBMC biotechnology2025
Explainable deep learning ensemble framework for accurate classification of wild poisonous mushroom species.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning continuous activation fields from microscopic SEM images of lycoperdioid fungi via CNN-guided neural operator modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating scanning electron microscopy, explainable deep learning, and ITS sequencing for accurate identification in some species Geastrum.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces an explainable deep learning framework for the accurate classification of wild poisonous mushroom species, contributing to food safety. A balanced dataset of 3600 high-resolution images representing 18 species was employed, split into training, validation, and test subsets. To enhance variability and reduce overfitting, the images were expanded using advanced augmentation techniques (rotation, flipping, brightness/contrast adjustments, noise injection, etc.), increasing the training set to 7200 samples. Four pretrained CNN architectures DenseNet121, EfficientNet-B3, MobileNet-V3, and ShuffleNet-V2 were fine-tuned via transfer learning and evaluated with multiple performance metrics. Among the individual models, EfficientNet-B3 achieved the highest accuracy of 93.0%. However, ensemble strategies based on soft voting consistently outperformed single models. The four-model ensemble (DenseNet121, EfficientNet-B3, MobileNet-V3, ShuffleNet-V2) achieved the best results with 95.67% accuracy, 95.42% MCC, and a log loss of 0.175. Explainable AI methods (Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++) revealed that classification decisions corresponded to biologically meaningful regions, thereby improving interpretability and reliability. This study holds direct life-saving potential by reducing poisoning incidents caused by misidentifications. In addition, it contributes to food safety by supporting reliable identification of toxic species within the agricultural and food supply chain. Furthermore, it pioneers the integration of AI methodologies in fungal taxonomy, providing a robust foundation for future ecological, agricultural, and biotechnological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.