Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449375›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2025

Enzymatic saccharification of Typha domingensis biomass: optimization and structural analysis.

Sumera Zaki, Hammad Afzal Kayani, Uroosa Ejaz, Mohammed Alorabi, Abdullah K Alanazi, Sheeba Naz, Muhammad Sohail, Zainul Abideen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sumera ZakiDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST) University, Karachi, 75600, Pakistan.
Hammad Afzal KayaniDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST) University, Karachi, 75600, Pakistan. hammad.afzal@szabist.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0002-3258-0535
Uroosa EjazDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (SZABIST) University, Karachi, 75600, Pakistan. uroosa.ejaz@szabist.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0001-5595-1370
Mohammed AlorabiDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Sciences, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah K AlanaziDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.
Sheeba NazDow College of Biotechnology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
Muhammad SohailDepartment of Microbiology, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Zainul AbideenDr Muhammad Ajmal Khan Institute of Sustainable Halophyte Utilization, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.

Funding

Taif University TU-DSPP - 2024 - 16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Halophytic plants have been recognized as a promising source of lignocellulosic biomass for bioconversion into value added products. In this study, cellulosic content of wild biomass from Typha domingensis was saccharified by cellulase from a thermophilic bacterium, Neobacillus sedimentimangrovi UE25. Indeed, this is the first report describing the use of enzymatic saccharification of T. domingensis biomass. Initially, the N. sedimentimangrovi UE25 cellulase was produced in the medium containing wild biomass from the halophyte plant. The data revealed that 159.84 IU mL

Indexed as

BiomassCellulaseBacillaceaeCelluloseLigninTemperatureCellulaseCelluloseLigninlignocellulose

Identifiers

PMID41449375
PMCPMC12849741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.