ArticleHeart failure reviews2025
Evaluating the role of mavacamten in symptomatic non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the ODYSSEY-HCM trial.
Article in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mavacamten in adolescent obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: SCOUTing a way forward.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM) is defined by exertional limitation without left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and lacks approved targeted therapies. ODYSSEY-HCM was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled adults with symptomatic nHCM and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 60% to receive mavacamten, a selective cardiac myosin inhibitor, or placebo for 48 weeks with dose titration guided by serial echocardiography. The co-primary endpoints were the change in peak oxygen uptake and the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score. Mavacamten produced clear pharmacodynamic effects manifested by reductions in circulating markers of myocardial stress and imaging indices consistent with modest reverse remodelling, but it did not produce statistically significant improvement in the prespecified co-primary clinical endpoints at 48 weeks. Treatment was associated with an increased incidence of reversible reductions in ejection fraction necessitating protocol-mandated dose interruption, indicating a constrained therapeutic window in this cohort. Collectively, the data demonstrate target engagement without definitive patient-centered benefit over the study interval. Further evaluation is required, including randomized trials of agents with alternative pharmacokinetic and titration properties, studies with extended exposure, and phenotype-enriched enrollment, to determine whether biomarker and imaging responses can be translated into sustained improvements in functional capacity and health-related quality of life in patients with nHCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41449316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.