ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Dual learning systems in talker identification: the effects of language, accent, and feedback.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Talker identification categorizes variable speech signals into stable talker representations, a process facilitated by language and accent familiarity. The dual learning systems (DLS) model posits that speech category learning involves a "reflective" system based on explicit rules and a "reflexive" system based on stimulus-reward associations, with reflexive learning dominating in later stages. In this study, we leverage the DLS framework to investigate talker learning by training Mandarin-speaking listeners to identify talkers in native (Mandarin) and nonnative languages with native (English) or nonnative, but familiar accents (Mandarin-accented English) contexts. Listeners received either using full (e.g., Incorrect. It's Talker 1) or minimally informative (e.g., Incorrect) feedback, encouraging reflective or reflexive learning, respectively. We assessed identification performance through accuracy and response times and analyzed the underlying decision processes using drift diffusion models. Results showed that language and accent familiarity improved accuracy and response times. At later training stages, minimal feedback, which promotes reflexive learning according to the DLS model, facilitated faster identification and more efficient decision-making, particularly in the nonnative language context (English). The findings highlight the benefit of reflexive learning in talker identification through improved response efficiency and the need to consider decision dynamics in this process. The data, materials, and analysis code are available online ( https://osf.io/g7r9q/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.