ArticleTranslational stroke research2025
Anticoagulation after Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Prognostic analysis of anticoagulation therapy in elderly patients with cardioembolic stroke].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the association of anticoagulation in patients with cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke (CES) who develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and its impact on neuroimaging and functional outcomes. This retrospective study enrolled patients presenting with CES within 48 h at a tertiary stroke center between January 2011 and August 2023. Patients who developed HT during hospitalization and underwent follow-up imaging within 1 week were included, focusing on those with hemorrhagic infarction or parenchymal hematoma type 1. Primary outcomes were HT exacerbation on follow-up imaging and 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) distribution shift, comparing anticoagulation therapy (AC), antiplatelet therapy (APT), and drug discontinuation (DDDD). The safety outcome was the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), which was defined as a hemorrhage concomitant with neurological deterioration. Among 763 patients with HT (age 74.6 ± 8.9 years, 48.1% male), AC was associated with a higher incidence of HT exacerbation compared to APT (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80, p-value = 0.005). AC associated with a better 3-month mRS compared to both APT (adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92, p-value = 0.017) and DD (adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.55, p-value < 0.001). sICH occurred in 5%, with rates of 1.5%, 2.1%, and 11.7% in the AC, APT, and DD groups, respectively (adjusted OR for DD vs. AC: 3.93, 95% CI 1.18-13.16, p-value = 0.026). Anticoagulation in CES patients with HT was associated with a better functional outcome and radiological exacerbation, without a significant increase in sICH risk. These findings suggest that the presence of HT should not necessarily preclude the use of anticoagulation therapy in this patient population. However, our study should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and confirmation from future prospective studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.