Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449266›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Assessing the robustness of an artificial intelligence segmentation model for quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging across cardiac phenotypes.

Hadil Saad, Clemens Ammann, Thomas Hadler, Yashraj Bhoyroo, Philine Reisdorf, Jana Veit, Teodora Chitiboi, Jens Wetzl, Christian Geppert, Jeanette Schulz-Menger

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hadil Saad *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-644X
Clemens Ammann *Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-4008
Thomas HadlerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-6858
Yashraj BhoyrooWorking Group on CMR, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Philine ReisdorfCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3968-8003
Jana VeitWorking Group on CMR, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Teodora ChitiboiSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-1549
Jens WetzlResearch & Clinical Translation, Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-2130
Christian GeppertResearch & Clinical Translation, Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.
Jeanette Schulz-MengerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. jeanette.schulz-menger@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-1092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo introduce an artificial intelligence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance segmentation algorithm (Nick) for automated quantification of function and parametric mapping across cardiac phenotypes reflecting clinical routine.

methodsNick was compared to manual gold standard (GS) segmentations in 359 multi-centre cases at 1.5T and 3T, consisting of 104 healthy individuals and 255 diseased patients with various cardiac phenotypes. Left and right ventricular (LV, RV) volumes and LV mass (LVM) were derived from short-axis segmentations. For parametric mapping, the LV myocardium was segmented to quantify T1 and T2 relaxation times. Statistical analysis comprised mean differences, correlation coefficients (R²), Bland-Altman analysis, tolerance range assessments, and paired boxplots. The number of slices and contours requiring manual correction was estimated based on slice-level differences.

resultsNick demonstrated high agreement with the GS for LV and RV volume estimations (R²≥0.93) and LVM quantification (R²=0.86). For the ejection fractions, correlations were slightly lower (R²=0.85/0.72 for LV/RV) with small mean differences (+ 1.14%/-2.48% for LV/RV). T1 and T2 mapping values showed excellent agreement with manual reference values (R²≥0.92) and minimal biases (-1.64/0.14 ms for T1/T2). Nick underestimated LV volumes at end-diastole (-4.48 ml) and end-systole (-3.28 ml) as well as the RV end-diastolic volume (-5.14 ml) and stroke volume (-6.75 ml). Nonetheless, tolerance testing for mean deviations revealed clinically acceptable biases for all comparisons, and less than two slices per case required correction on average.

conclusionComparison to expert segmentations revealed robust performance of Nick in routine clinical cases with variable pathology, supporting its future integration into clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHeart DiseasesImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVentricular Function, LeftAdultAgedAlgorithmsAutomationCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligenceCardiac functionCardiac phenotypesCardiovascular magnetic resonanceSegmentationTissue characterization

Identifiers

PMID41449266
PMCPMC12909472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.