Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449223›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Clinical predictive fusion network for accurate disease prediction in patient cohorts.

Md Zeyauddin, Shafiqul Abidin, Imran Khan, Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari, Md Ashraf Siddiqui, Ausaf Ahmad, Shadab Alam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md ZeyauddinDepartment of Computer Science , Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh, India.
Shafiqul AbidinDepartment of Computer Science , Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh, India.
Imran KhanSchool of Computer Science, UPES, Dehradun, India. imran.khan1@ddn.upes.ac.in.
Mohammad Ubaidullah BokhariDepartment of Computer Science , Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh, India.
Md Ashraf SiddiquiDepartment of Computer Science , Aligarh Muslim University , Aligarh, India.
Ausaf AhmadDepartment of Computer Application , Integral University , Lucknow, India.
Shadab AlamDepartment of Computer Science , Jazan University , Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity of healthcare data demands predictive models that are both accurate and interpretable. This study presents the Clinical Predictive Fusion Network (CPFN). This adaptive ensemble learning framework integrates Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine classifiers through a validation-driven weighted fusion strategy. The model's adaptive weighting enables it to learn the relative reliability of base classifiers across multimodal patient datasets. CPFN was evaluated using 10-fold stratified cross-validation on disease-specific (cardiology, neurology, diabetes, pulmonology, and oncology) and a synthetically fused multi-disease dataset, achieving up to 93.0 ± 0.4% accuracy on individual datasets and 95.5 ± 0.3% on the combined dataset. Other metrics included a recall of 92.0 ± 0.5%, F1-score of 92.5 ± 0.4%, and ROC-AUC ranging from 0.95 to 0.975 (95% CI, bootstrap 1000 resamples). These results demonstrate that CPFN maintains consistent and generalizable performance across heterogeneous data sources. The model's transparent fusion design and detailed pseudocode enhance reproducibility and clinical applicability, positioning CPFN as a scalable, data-driven decision-support framework for next-generation predictive healthcare systems.

Indexed as

DiseaseEnsemble LearningPredictive Learning ModelsCohort StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsRandom ForestReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineAI in healthcareClinical decision systemEnsemble learningPredictive analysisTreatment therapy prediction

Identifiers

PMID41449223
PMCPMC12848016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.