Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A decision making algorithm for economic growth in the digital economy using CRITIC WASPAS based circular picture fuzzy information.

Junguang Gao, Ziyao Lin, Quan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junguang GaoBeijing Research Institute of Frontier Science, Beijing, 102488, China.
Ziyao LinFaculty of Business, Lingnan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Tuen Mun, 999077, China.
Quan LiuGuangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, 511363, Guangdong, China. 13631394197@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explore the use of fuzzy set (FS) theory to address uncertainty in evaluating strategies that drive economic growth within the digital economy. Specifically, we employ a circular picture fuzzy (CPF) set (CPFS). As economies become increasingly digital, decision-makers face complex challenges in selecting the most effective strategies for growth, ranging from digital infrastructure investment to innovation support and policy reform. To assess these strategic options, we consider five alternatives, each evaluated against five key attributes. To ensure objectivity in weighing these attributes, we first apply the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method, which calculates weights based on the contrast intensity and interdependencies among the attributes. Next, we use the WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) method to rank the alternatives. Furthermore, we develop a decision-making algorithm tailored for multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM), integrating the CRITIC-WASPAS approach within the CPFS framework. This model is applied to a hypothetical case study focused on digital economy growth strategies, demonstrating its practical utility in uncertain and complex decision environments. After the evaluation, the second alternative, E-Governance and Digital Policy Reform, emerged as the most optimal strategy for promoting economic growth in the digital economy. To validate the robustness of the proposed approach, we conduct a sensitivity analysis and a comparative evaluation with existing methods. The results confirm that our model provides reliable and effective support for strategic decision-making aimed at fostering economic growth in the digital age.

Indexed as

Circular picture fuzzy setCRITIC-WASPAS techniqueDecision-makingEconomic growth in the digital economy

Identifiers

PMID41449170
PMCPMC12800098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.