ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2026
Eligibility criteria for the UK Winter Fuel Payment: are we targeting the right people?
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCold weather remains a serious health threat in the UK and elsewhere, particularly for older adults. The Winter Fuel Payment has been a key government strategy to mitigate health risks linked to cold homes in the UK, but recent policy shifts have raised questions about whether income-based eligibility criteria effectively identify those most at risk.
methodsWe analysed cold-related mortality in adults aged ≥75 across 324 local authority districts in England (2007-2019) using distributed lag non-linear models in a spatial Bayesian framework. Multivariate meta-regression was used to evaluate modification of cold effects by deprivation, income-based pension credit uptake, home energy efficiency and fuel poverty.
resultsAreas in the highest quartile of fuel poverty had significantly greater cold-related mortality risk than those in the lowest quartile, with a 15.3% versus 13.1% increase in mortality risk at the first compared with the 50th percentile of wintertime temperature, ie, an absolute difference of 2.2% (p<0.001). This effect was stronger than the corresponding differences for energy efficiency (1.7%, p=0.04), income as indicated by pension credit uptake (0.6%, p=0.39) and deprivation-based measures, for which differences were minimal. Overall, an estimated 17% of cold-related deaths among people aged ≥75 were attributable to fuel poverty.
conclusionFuel poverty, an indicator designed to capture both low-income and housing energy efficiency, is a stronger predictor of cold-related mortality than income (as indicated by pension credit update) or deprivation-based indicators alone. Winter energy support schemes should consider fuel poverty metrics in their targeting to more effectively reduce health risks associated with cold homes and improve equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.