ArticleOpen heart2025
Development and validation of a deep learning model for severe mitral stenosis detection from chest X-rays.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough chest X-rays (CXRs) are widely used, diagnosing mitral stenosis (MS) based solely on CXR findings remains challenging in some cases.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect MS using CXR.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 515 posteroanterior CXR images were analysed, including 285 from patients with MS and 230 from healthy controls. The dataset was randomly divided into training, validation and test datasets at a 7:2:1 ratio. An AI model was formulated by using the training dataset, and model performance was evaluated on the validation and test datasets using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1-score and accuracy. Saliency maps were generated to visualise the regions prioritised by the model.
resultsThe model achieved an AUC of 0.99 on the validation dataset, with a precision of 0.96, recall of 0.96, F1-score of 0.96 and accuracy of 0.96. On the test dataset, the model achieved an AUC of 0.99, with a precision of 0.95, recall of 0.94, F1-score of 0.94 and accuracy of 0.94. Saliency maps highlighted regions consistent with known radiographic features of MS.
conclusionThe developed deep learning-based AI model demonstrated high performance in detecting MS from CXR. This approach may provide a convenient and accessible screening tool for MS, particularly in resource-limited areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.