ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
AstroID resource: a scalable, relational database structure for longitudinal biomarker discovery.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe biological sciences are producing increasingly larger datasets for biomarker discovery. While common data models have been developed for medical terms as they relate to patient health outcomes, a data model that supports longitudinal tracking of biospecimens and relating them against an individual patient experience is a large, unmet need.
methodA structure and associated taxonomy were achieved through a six-tier build in Research Electronic Data CAPture (REDCap), which organizes the complexity of the therapeutic decisions, biospecimens, and outcomes that characterize a longitudinal patient experience. Modules were developed to support export of REDCap data into a Structured Query Language (SQL) format for merging with extended biomarker data, also housed in SQL.
resultsThe resultant AstroID resource is a relational structure for clinical and biospecimen data that meets several desired goals: searchable, flexible, generic, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, auditable, and easy-to-use. The essential elements forming the core of the six-tiered build are provided, so others can readily adopt this schema, as well as an example of an extended, customized build to support biomarker discovery for patients with melanoma. Two examples where this data structure was used to support biomarker discovery and development are described, and example queries of the database are also presented. To the extent possible, the data dictionary was aligned with large data models, such as those for the National Institutes of Health's Human Tumor Atlas Network. The structure can readily scale to accommodate thousands of patients, multimodality data, and spatial characterization of billions of cells. Radiologic imagery can also be included along with pathology imagery to support spatial studies, including artificial intelligence-driven analyses.
conclusionsThis effort provides a database model for investigators conducting research on large volumes of biospecimens with clinical annotation. We have now deployed this structure in our laboratories and have over 1B cells spatially mapped, each effectively tagged with the clinical information from longitudinal patient experiences. While the description uses the example of cancer biomarkers, this data structure could be used to characterize longitudinal biospecimens from any disease process. In the near future, automatic synchronization between the electronic medical record and one or more AstroID databases is anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.