Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41448797›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025

Baseline characteristics from the EXCITING-ILD registry.

Katharina Buschulte, Hans-Joachim Kabitz, Lars Hagmeyer, Peter Hammerl, Albert Esselmann, Conrad Wiederhold, Dirk Skowasch, Christoph Stolpe, Marcus Joest, Stefan Veitshans and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Katharina BuschulteCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7598-5276
Hans-Joachim KabitzDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Lars HagmeyerClinic of Pneumology and Allergology, Center of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Hospital Bethanien Solingen, Solingen, Germany.
Peter HammerlChest Clinic Immenhausen, Immenhausen, Germany.
Albert EsselmannOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Warendorf, Germany.
Conrad WiederholdOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Fulda, Germany.
Dirk SkowaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph StolpeOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Ibbenbüren, Germany.
Marcus JoestOutpatient Center for Pulmonology and Allergology, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan VeitshansOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Böblingen, Germany.
Marc HöffgenOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Rheine, Germany.
Phillen MaqhuzuInstitute of Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Center Munich GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Larissa SchwarzkopfInstitute of Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Center Munich GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Andreas HellmannOutpatient Center for Pulmonology, Augsburg, Germany.
Michael PfeiferMedical Clinic II, University of Regensburg and Klinikum Donaustauf, Donaustauf, Germany.
Juergen BehrGerman Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
Rainer KarpaviciusPatient Support Group Lungenfibrose e.V, Essen, Germany.
Andreas GuentherMedical Clinic II, University Hospital Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Giessen, Germany.
Markus PolkeCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp HögerCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Vivien SomogyiMainz Center for Pulmonary Medicine, Departments of Pneumology, Mainz University Medical Center and of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Marienhaus Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph LedererCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases, Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp MarkartPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Agaplesion Evangelisches Krankenhaus Mittelhessen, Giessen, Germany.
Michael KreuterMainz Center for Pulmonary Medicine, Departments of Pneumology, Mainz University Medical Center and of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Marienhaus Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany Michael.Kreuter@marienhaus.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a group of more than 200 different subtypes. They vary widely in terms of incidence, prognosis and treatment, yet real-life data from Germany are sparse.

methodsThe prospective Exploring Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Interstitial Lung Diseases (EXCITING)-ILD registry included patients with all different ILD subtypes from different healthcare settings. Follow-up ranged from 36 months to 5 years. Data were analysed descriptively. Baseline characteristics, diagnostic and treatment information are presented as absolute numbers and percentages. The Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to quantify differences between groups. Line plots and bar plots were used for graphical presentation.

resultsA total of 601 patients (60.7% men, mean age 64.3 years) from 32 centres were included in the EXCITING-ILD registry. The most common subtypes were sarcoidosis with 26.6% (n=160) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with 25.3% (n=152). Pulmonary hypertension was present in 8.7% of patients (n=52), with high incidences in connective tissue disease-associated ILD (16.3%) and pneumoconiosis (27.3%). The mean forced vital capacity was 76.4% predicted, and the mean DLCO-SB (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide) was 54.1% predicted. The mean time to diagnosis was 38.8 months (SD 64.4) and was significantly shorter when the diagnosis was made after multidisciplinary discussion (31.6 vs 49.2 months, p<0.001). The frequency of surgical lung biopsies decreased over time in the registry, whereas the proportion of cryobiopsies showed a notable increase. In IPF, the number of patients treated with antifibrotics increased from 35.2% before 2015 to 48.4% in 2019.

conclusionThe EXCITING-ILD registry describes the frequency of ILD subtypes, ILD-related impairments, selected comorbidities and diagnostic and treatment patterns in a representative German population.

Indexed as

Lung Diseases, InterstitialRegistriesAgedFemaleGermanyHumansHypertension, PulmonaryIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesVital CapacityIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInterstitial FibrosisSarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID41448797
PMCPMC12742170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.