ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Digitally assessed home FEV
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05357274 (A System to Classify Treatable Traits in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A System to Classify Treatable Traits in Primary Care
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA significant proportion of patients with asthma remain uncontrolled despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators. Multiple reasons exist for this. Suboptimal inhaler adherence, inadequate inhaler technique and continuous exposure to allergens are often found to contribute to poor asthma control. Additionally, symptoms from some comorbid conditions, such as obesity, GORD and deconditioning, may be perceived as arising from asthma. The first priority should always be to confirm if asthma is the cause of the patients' current symptoms. METHODS & ANALYSIS: In this protocol paper, we describe the design of a prospective cohort replicate study. We will test the hypothesis that digitally acquired data on lung function and medication use can better establish that asthma is the cause of symptoms, rather than guideline-recommended practice. Patients with clinician-diagnosed asthma who remain uncontrolled despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment will be enrolled. Over 26 weeks and five visits, lung function, markers of T2 inflammation and symptoms will be repeatedly assessed. The 'ground truth' diagnosis for each patient will be established using a multimodal template comprised of lung function, T2 inflammation data, response to treatment, assessment of alternative diagnoses and patient outcome over time.The primary aim of this study is to compare guideline-recommended methods to diagnose asthma with a novel metric derived from digitally measured lung function in combination with T2 inflammation, which has been developed in an independent cohort of patients with severe asthma and a healthy control group. In secondary analysis, we will assess the direct costs and cost-effectiveness of this approach. ETHICS & DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the Beaumont Hospital's Research & Ethics Committee, REC number 21/89. Participants completed an informed, written consent form. Data will be analysed, anonymised and reported in relevant peer-reviewed journals and at national and international conferences. Data will be anonymised prior to publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05357274.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.