ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Design of the MIST study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial of pirfenidone solution for inhalation in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06329401 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone Solution for Inhalation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone Solution for Inhalation (AP01) in Participants With PPF
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProgressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a debilitating progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Oral pirfenidone has been studied in non-IPF ILDs, but in smaller academic studies, it did not achieve a statistically significant change in the primary endpoint. Increased systemic exposure with oral administration may lead to substantial adverse events and limit its utility. Clinical data support inhaled pirfenidone for the treatment of PPF with improved tolerability compared with orally administered pirfenidone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Approximately 300 patients with PPF will be randomised 2:1:2 to one of three treatment arms: AP01 100 mg two times per day, AP01 50 mg two times per day or placebo two times per day by oral inhalation using the investigational eFlow Nebuliser System (PARI Pharma GmbH, Germany). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in forced vital capacity at week 52. The main secondary endpoints are change in quality of life measurements from baseline to 52 weeks, time to disease progression and change in lung fibrosis scores based on high-resolution CT from baseline to 52 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06329401.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.