ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2025
[Finite element analysis of tibial and femoral resection configurations on varus alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A certain degree of varus alignment is physiological in the native knee, and alignment strategies such as kinematic and functional alignment permit residual postoperative varus. However, identical total varus angles may result from varying combinations of femoral and tibial varus, whose biomechanical implications for implant loading and ligament stress remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical effects of different femoral-tibial varus configurations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Using combined geometric modeling and finite element analysis, TKA models with different varus combinations were constructed to evaluate changes in limb moment arms, polyethylene insert stress, and ligament forces during static knee flexion (0°-90°). Results demonstrated that a higher proportion of femoral varus, under equivalent total varus and flexion angles, led to reduced maximum polyethylene stress and decreased tension in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterolateral ligament complex (ALL). Knee flexion angle had a more significant impact on polyethylene stress than varus: stress increased by approximately 2.48 times at 90° flexion compared to 0°, whereas 12° varus increased stress by only approximately 14%. The ALL experienced the greatest tensile load during flexion, indicating a key stabilizing role. In conclusion, optimizing the combination of femoral and tibial varus may help redistribute loads and improve implant longevity. This study reveals, from a biomechanical perspective, how different varus configurations affect stress distribution in the prosthesis and surrounding soft tissues, suggesting that intraoperative osteotomy strategies should comprehensively consider the combined alignment of the femur and tibia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.