ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Diagnostic accuracy of newborn foot length measurement in identifying low birth weight and preterm infants in Sidama Region, Ethiopia.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth significantly contribute to increased risks of neonatal mortality, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Early identification of and timely intervention for these vulnerable infants remains challenging. Simple anthropometric measurements, such as foot length (FL), have emerged as potential alternatives to identify small and vulnerable newborns. This study aims to assess the accuracy of FL as a screening tool to identify LBW and preterm babies and to establish appropriate cut-off points for the local context.
methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialised Hospital and Bushulo Mother, Newborn and Child Health Specialty Centre and Primary healthcare from 15 May 2024 to 6 July 2024; 396 mother-newborn dyads were included using a consecutive sampling technique. Data were collected through interview, medical record review and FL measurement using digital calliper. Birth weight was measured using calibrated digital weight scales. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the distribution of measured characteristics and determine optimal FL cut-off points for identifying LBW and preterm babies.
resultsThe study included 61 (15.4%) LBW and 48 (12.3%) preterm babies. FL showed a strong correlation with birth weight (r=0.79) and moderate correlation with gestational age (r=0.62). The optimal cut-off point for identifying LBW babies was 70.65 mm, yielding 93.4% sensitivity, 91.6% specificity and an area under receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.98). For preterm babies, the optimal cut-off was 69.95 mm, with 76.7% sensitivity, 91.1% specificity and an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.96).
conclusionFL has demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy to identify LBW and preterm newborns. Optimal accuracy of identifying LBW and preterm babies in similar populations can be achieved at 70.65 and 69.95 mm cut-off points, respectively. In designing FL-based screening tools, appropriate cut-off points for the required level of accuracy should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.