ArticleBMJ open2025
Time-dependent predictive performance of inflammatory markers for 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with suspected infection in a Japanese emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine Learning Predictive Models for Surgical Site Infections: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Age- and Virus-Composition-Aware Interpretation of Respiratory Viral Co-Detection Using Same-Day C-Reactive Protein Profiles: A 2008-2024 Multiplex PCR Laboratory Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the time-dependent predictive performance of inflammatory markers for 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with suspected infection.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingThe ambulatory care division of the department of general medicine or the emergency department of a single acute care hospital in Japan, from April 2015 to March 2017.
participantsThe participants were 977 consecutive adult patients with suspected infection defined as those who underwent at least two sets of blood culture. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome, ascertained from electronic medical records, was 30-day all-cause mortality. The predictive performance of three inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and red cell distribution width (RDW)) was assessed across four time intervals from symptom onset to hospital presentation: ≤6, >6 to ≤24, >24 to ≤72, and >72 hours.
resultsTime from symptom onset to hospital presentation influenced the predictive performance of inflammatory markers for 30-day all-cause mortality, and CRP ≥15 mg/dL was the most useful for identifying patients at higher risk of mortality within 6 hours (positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 7.7); however, this association weakened over time (LR+ 1.3 at >72 hours). Conversely, RDW ≥16% became more informative later in the course (LR+ 4.1 at >72 hours). For identifying patients at lower risk of 30-day all-cause mortality, CRP <5 mg/dL showed some utility after 6 hours (negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.5-0.7), while RDW <14% was more predictive after 72 hours (LR- 0.3).
conclusionThese findings suggest the potential utility of CRP for ruling in high-risk patients within 6 hours from symptom onset, and of RDW for both ruling in and ruling out patients after 72 hours, thereby suggesting that time-dependent variations are important when interpreting inflammatory markers in emergency care settings. However, caution is needed when interpreting these findings because of the retrospective design of this study and potential selection bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.