Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41448706›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Does a history of sickle cell disease affect the prescription of morphine? An international, randomised study based on clinical vignettes conducted among emergency physicians.

Fabien Coisy, Alexandre Simon, Céline Occelli, Florence Dupriez, François-Xavier Ageron, Lorie N'Diaye, Anne-Laure Feral-Pierssens, Gregory Yates, Xavier Bobbia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06835335 (Differential Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06835335 completednot on this map

Differential Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: a Vignette-based International Randomised Trial.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2025 to 2025Enrolled1,063ConditionsDiscrimination, Racial, Pain Management, Emergency Medicine, Sickle Cell DiseaseArmsopioid prescription
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabien CoisyIMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France fabien.coisy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-3534
Alexandre SimonMontpellier University, Montpellier, Occitanie, France.
Céline OccelliEmergency Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, Occitanie, France.
Florence DupriezCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
François-Xavier AgeronEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lorie N'DiayeEmergency Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France.
Anne-Laure Feral-PierssensLEPS UR3412, Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Paris, France.
Gregory YatesEmergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Xavier BobbiaIMAGINE UR UM 103, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess whether emergency physicians prescribe morphine differently for patients with or without sickle cell disease (SCD). Given the difficulty of comparing strictly homogeneous patients in real clinical settings, we used a standardised clinical vignette to ensure that all clinical information was identical except for SCD status and sex.

designInternational, randomised controlled, vignette-based study conducted online. The four vignette versions differed only in patient sex and SCD status, with all other clinical information fully standardised. Vignettes were validated by an expert panel and randomly allocated using a computer-generated sequence.

settingEmergency physicians practising in France, the UK, Belgium and Switzerland were invited to complete an online survey between 17 February and 17 March 2025.

participantsA total of 1060 physicians responded, of whom 953 (90%) met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Respondents were practising emergency department (ED) physicians without exclusion based on seniority or training level. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of simulated patients for whom morphine was prescribed. Secondary outcomes included the number and type of analgesics prescribed and the proportion of cases meeting predefined criteria for maximal level of care (urgent triage category, lactate sampling, CT imaging and morphine administration).

resultsMorphine was prescribed in 444 of 492 (90%) SCD vignettes and 389 of 461 (84%) non-SCD vignettes (absolute difference: 6% (95% CI 1% to 10%)). Morphine monotherapy was used in 41% of SCD cases and combined analgesia in 50%. No significant differences were observed according to patient sex or physician characteristics. Maximal level of care was recommended in 22% of SCD cases.

conclusionIn this randomised vignette study, emergency physicians prescribed morphine more frequently for simulated patients with SCD than for those without SCD, despite identical clinical presentations. These findings contrast with real-world reports of inadequate analgesia in SCD and suggest that the absence of perceptual cues-such as skin colour or names-may reduce implicit bias in opioid prescribing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06835335. IRB CHU Nîmes No 25.02.01.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnemia, Sickle CellMorphinePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultBelgiumEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineEmergency DepartmentsHealth Services AccessibilityPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID41448706
PMCPMC12742085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.