Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41448686›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the emergency department: EFFI-PNO protocol - a multicentre, cluster-controlled, stepped-wedge, randomised interventional study.

Sabrina Kepka, Valérie Wilmé, Martin Duracinsky, Cezar Matau, Arnaud Nze Ossima, Cedric Gil Jardine, Pierrick Le Borgne, Nicolas Marjanovic, Tania Marx, Mickaël Ohana and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06471608 (Impact of Ambulatory Management for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Department on Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06471608 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Impact of Ambulatory Management for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Department on Quality of Life: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRan2025 to 2030Enrolled386ConditionsPrimary Spontaneous Pneumothorax, Quality of Life, Ambulatory Care, Chest TubeArmsAmbulatory management, Standard Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sabrina KepkaEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France sabrinakepka@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-5005
Valérie WilméEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Martin DuracinskyURCEco, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Cezar MatauPneumologie Unit, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Arnaud Nze OssimaURCEco, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Cedric Gil JardineDepartment of Emergency, University Hospital Centre Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Pierrick Le BorgneEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolas MarjanovicDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Tania MarxCHU de Besançon, Besancon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-9423
Mickaël OhanaRadiology unit, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier PeyronyEmergency Department Saint Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Anne-Laure PhilipponDepartment of Emergency, Hopital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Damien ViglinoDepartment of Emergency, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Aline ChenouEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Raphael Clere-JehlEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Pascal BilbaultEmergency department, University Hospital Centre Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Isabelle Durand-ZaleskiURCEco, AP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4078-1476
Erik André SauleauICube, Illkirch, Grand Est, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor large primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), drainage or simple aspiration are the two first-line treatment options. Outpatient ambulatory strategies have a success rate of almost 80% with few complications. New French recommendations suggest that an outpatient strategy should be preferred if an appropriate care network is in place. However, establishing this care network remains the main obstacle to the use of this strategy. Thus, outpatient management of PSP remains rare, which is neither optimal for the patient, with a likely impact on quality of life (QOL) and satisfaction with care, nor for the healthcare system, with increased costs. We hypothesise that outpatient treatment of PSP compared with usual inpatient management could improve quality of care and represent a more efficient, generalisable and sustainable strategy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre, cluster-controlled, randomised interventional study with stepped wedge implementation, patients aged 18-50 presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a first episode of large PSP will be enrolled in seven university hospitals in France. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on changes in QOL of an ambulatory strategy for the management of large PSP in the ED compared with usual inpatient management. The primary outcome is the difference in QOL as measured by SF-36 score, between drain placement and 6 months. Clinical criteria (pulmonary expansion at 6 days, pain, dyspnoea, complications, recurrence), perceived quality of care (satisfaction, patient preference, anxiety) and ease of implementation of the care pathway will also be assessed. A cost-utility analysis will be carried out to evaluate the incremental cost-utility ratio at 1 year, defined as the difference in costs divided by the difference in utility estimated by the EQ-5D scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest III N° 2024-36. Study findings will be disseminated by publication in a high-impact international journal. Results will be presented at national and international emergency healthcare meetings, and participating patients notified of the main conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry NCT06471608. The trial protocol and statistical design are fully described in this study protocol. Additional data can be provided on reasonable request to the sponsor. PROTOCOL VERSION: V2.1 - 21/11/2024.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalPneumothoraxAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDrainageFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical ProtocolsEmergency DepartmentsEmergency Service, HospitalHEALTH ECONOMICSRESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine)

Identifiers

PMID41448686
PMCPMC12742060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.