ArticleBMJ open2025
Building a library of acute traumatic spinal cord injury images across Canada: a retrospective cohort study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monitoring morphometric drift in lifelong learning segmentation of the spinal cord.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMRI is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool for assessing prognosis and predicting outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Several potential MRI biomarkers have been identified, but efforts are still needed to improve the accuracy and feasibility of these biomarkers in clinical practice. This study aims to build a national Canadian SCI imaging repository for storing and analysing imaging data for SCI, with the goal of improving SCI MRI biomarkers to predict outcomes and inform clinical management. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: As a substudy of the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR), this retrospective multisite study includes individuals who sustained a traumatic cervical SCI between 2015 and 2021, were previously enrolled in RHSCIR, and had MRI scans acquired within 72 hours of injury and before any surgical intervention. Individuals with a penetrating trauma and/or with any prior spine surgery are excluded. The study principal investigator and research associates, experienced with data curation and with the standardised format and specifications of the Brain Imaging Data Structure standard, guide the site's curator on the steps to perform image deidentification and curation to create standardised datasets across all sites. These datasets are transferred to a Digital Research Alliance of Canada ('the Alliance') server designated for this project and concatenated to form the national Canadian SCI imaging repository (Neurogitea). We are using a semiautomated processing pipeline to quantify lesion morphology, together with additional imaging measures that are manually extracted from the images (for instance, the relative maximal spinal cord compression and the maximum canal compromise). Through linkage to RHSCIR clinical and epidemiological data already available on eligible participants, regression analysis is planned to predict neurological outcomes at discharge, including the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, upper and lower extremity motor and sensory scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been submitted by the participating sites to obtain ethics and institutional approvals prior to the study initiation at each site. All 12 sites across Canada have now obtained ethics and institutional approvals. Study results will be disseminated at local, national and international conferences and by journal publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.