ArticleJournal of molecular biology2026
Bacterial Chemoreceptors Transmit Stimulus Signals Through Coupled Entropic Switches.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signaling mechanism of the transmembrane energy receptor Aer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structure and signaling mechanism ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracking ligand-induced conformational changes through transmembrane sensory proteins remains a challenge in signal transduction research. Our study followed propagation of stimulus signals through a bacterial transmembrane chemoreceptor (Tsr) that controls a cytoplasmic signaling kinase (CheA). We marked relay elements in the ∼200-Å long cytoplasmic four-helix bundle signaling domain with amino acid replacements that locked Tsr in kinase-ON or -OFF output and characterized the mutant receptors with in vivo assays that monitored Tsr structure (crosslinking) and function (kinase control). We found that conformational changes emanating from the mutant lesions propagated bidirectionally throughout the Tsr signaling domain and did not dissipate appreciably with distance, implying conformational coupling between subdomains. These behaviors proved intrinsic to Tsr homodimers and independent of higher order signaling complexes. AlphaFold 3 atomic models of the mutant receptors exhibited structural changes that would likely affect local helix packing interactions at the mutant sites. One member of each ON-OFF mutant pair appeared to reduce packing stability, whereas the other enhanced packing stability. This analysis pinpointed two sites of structural logic inversion ("entropic switches") in the Tsr transmission path. Kinase-OFF lesions appeared to be stabilizing at the input and output segments of the cytoplasmic domain but destabilizing in the intervening signaling region that contains the modification sites for sensory adaptation. These findings support the notion of chemoreceptor signaling through opposed dynamic switches and provide new insights into the mechanism of kinase output control. This work also highlights the powerful interplay possible between cellular signaling readouts and AF3-generated models of mutant proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.