ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2026
Representation meets optimization: Training PINNs and PIKANs for gray-box discovery in systems pharmacology.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Practical Tutorial on Physics-Informed Networks for Pharmacometrics and Quantitative Systems Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- The architecture of computational antiviralism: a multi-scale framework from molecular targeting to viral ecosystem engineering.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- A Multiscale Signaling-Biophysical Framework Reveals Mechanisms of Macrophage-Mediated RBC Clearance in Sickle Cell and Gaucher Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In Silico Post-screening of Anti-polymerization Agents to Treat Sickle Cell Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-Informed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (PIKANs) have been gaining attention as an effective counterpart to the original multilayer perceptron-based Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). Both representation models can address inverse problems and facilitate gray-box system identification. However, a comprehensive understanding of their performance in terms of accuracy and speed remains underexplored. In particular, we introduce a modified PIKAN architecture, tanh-cPIKAN, which is based on Chebyshev polynomials for parametrization of the univariate functions with an extra nonlinearity for enhanced performance. We then present a systematic investigation of how the choices of optimizer, representation, and training configuration influence the performance of PINNs and PIKANs in the context of systems pharmacology modeling. We benchmark a wide range of optimizers using simple but representative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. We use the new Optax library [1] as well as a new class of self-scaled optimizers developed in Optimistix library [2] to identify the most effective combinations for learning gray-boxes under ill-posed, non-unique, and data-sparse conditions. We examine the influence of model architecture (MLP vs. KAN), numerical precision (single vs. double), the need for warm-up phases for second-order methods, and sensitivity to the initial learning rate. We also assess the optimizer scalability for larger models and analyze the trade-offs introduced by JAX in terms of computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. Using two representative systems pharmacology examples, a pharmacokinetics model and a chemotherapy drug response model, we offer practical guidance on selecting optimizers and representation models/architectures for robust and efficient gray-box discovery. Our findings provide actionable insights for improving the training of physics-informed networks in systems pharmacology, systems biology, and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.