ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2025
Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Surgical Approach and Outcomes in Young Women with Breast Cancer.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Breast cancer treatment disparities persist and include surgical approach. This study evaluated the association of race, ethnicity, employment, and insurance status with the selected surgical approach and the effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in young women with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database (Sandra Levine Young Women's Breast Cancer Program) identified women aged ≤40 years diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer from 2010-2019 who underwent surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models and Cox proportional-hazards models were fitted. Results: Of the 700 women, 4% were Asian, 26% Black, and 69% White. Reported ethnicity was: 67% non-Hispanic, 5% Hispanic, and 27% unknown or unreported. Clinical stage distribution was 86% early stage (0-II) and 11% stage III. Among patients with invasive cancer (n = 624), 51% were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, 21% were HR-negative/HER2-negative, 20% were HR-positive/HER2-positive, and 8% were HR-negative/HER2-positive. Local, regional, or distant recurrence occurred in 13.1% of patients who underwent lumpectomy and in 16.4% of those who underwent mastectomy ( Conclusion: Young Black women were more likely than White women to elect the less-invasive surgery (lumpectomy). Private insurance was associated with better OS and RFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.