ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2025
Turkish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Tool of Myofascial Adhesions in Patients After Breast Cancer.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Myofascial adhesions are an important cause of upper extremity dysfunction among breast cancer surgery (BCS) patients. Myofascial-adhesions-in-patients-after-breast-cancer (MAP-BC) is a quantitative method developed to assess scar tissue and adhesions. This study aims to create a Turkish version of the MAP-BC tool and to test its validity and reliability. Materials and Methods: This cross-cultural adaptation and validation study included 81 female BCS patients aged 18-80 years. For convergent validity, patients were assessed using MAP-BC and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale observer subscale. For test-retest reliability, the patients were assessed on days 0 and 14. Thirty-two patients were evaluated by a second researcher to assess interrater reliability. Results: Validity was fair to good (rho = 0.631). For test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation (ICC) values for the subgroups ranged from 0.798 to 0.954, with an ICC = 0.948 for the total score, indicating good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Interrater ICC values ranged from 0.417 to 0.949, with ICC = 0.938 for the total score, suggesting good to excellent interrater agreement, except for the "frontal chest wall" section. Conclusion: The Turkish MAP-BC tool is valid and reliable for evaluating myofascial adhesions and scars after BCS and adjuvant treatments. Clinicians are encouraged to use MAP-BC to detect myofascial adhesions and evaluate treatment efficacy, as this is the first tool available in Turkish for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.