ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
In silico PCR-RFLP identification of forensically important Calliphoridae.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate a cost-effective and rapid molecular approach for identifying forensically important Calliphoridae using an in silico PCR-RFLP assay designed with degenerate primers.
methodsCOX1 gene sequences from Calliphoridae species were retrieved from the NCBI database. Multiple sequence alignment with MAFFT identified conserved and variable regions for degenerate primer design in Primer3Plus. In silico PCR was simulated with Serial Cloner, and primer specificity was assessed using Primer-BLAST. Restriction enzyme screening was performed with NEBcutter and RFLP-inator to evaluate single and double digestions, and to generate species-specific fragment patterns.
resultsAnalysis of 47 COX1 sequences identified a highly variable 178-bp fragment suitable for species-level differentiation. The degenerate primers amplified all target species without cross-reactivity with human DNA. Single digestion with AluI differentiated four of six species, while double digestion with AluI/BsaJI resolved seven of nine. Additional enzymes (MseI, BsmAI) further discriminated challenging species pairs, enabling differentiation of 17 out of 18 species.
conclusionThe in silico PCR-RFLP assay presented here provides a promising molecular tool for identifying forensically relevant Calliphoridae species, with potential to improve postmortem interval (PMI) estimation. Experimental validation is required to confirm its applicability in forensic casework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41447400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.