ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
Friction and vibration generated during sliding over bare skin correlate with perceived smoothness and moistness.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTactile perception of the skin is a key factor for consumers when evaluating skincare products, yet conventional sensory assessments are subjective, costly and often lack clear physical interpretations. This study aims to bridge this gap by developing a tactile sensor that quantifies physical parameters relevant to skin feel and combines these measurements with sensory evaluation.
methodsA tactile sensor with a stainless-steel probe replicating a human fingerprint was developed to measure physical parameters-specifically, vibration and friction-during controlled rubbing on the cheek. Simultaneously, blinded sensory evaluations were performed by assessors rating six attributes: smooth-rough, moisturized-dry, soft-hard (surface), soft-hard (base), elastic-not elastic and oily-not oily. Multiple regression analyses were conducted using vibration features and friction coefficients as independent variables and sensory evaluation scores as dependent variables.
resultsRegression analysis revealed that perceived smoothness (smooth-rough) was predicted by amplitudes of high-frequency vibration (R
conclusionThese findings highlight the potential of objective, instrument-based tactile measurements to elucidate the physical basis of sensory evaluation terms in skincare. This approach may enhance the training of sensory evaluation panels and improve the consistency and reliability of product assessment, ultimately supporting more effective product development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.