ReviewTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Decision-Making in Keratoprosthesis: Navigating Device Selection in Complex Ocular Scenarios.
Review in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation serves as a last resort for visual rehabilitation in patients with end-stage bilateral corneal blindness, particularly when conventional corneal transplantation is no longer viable. Advances in biomaterials and refinements in prosthetic design have significantly enhanced anatomical retention and visual outcomes. Among the various types available, the Boston type 1 and 2 devices and the modified osteo-odonto-KPro remain the most widely utilized globally. This review aims to support comprehensive clinical decision-making by providing an in-depth overview of the design characteristics, surgical considerations, and postoperative care protocols associated with the most widely used KPro devices. In addition, we discuss a broad range of influencing factors, including the status of the ocular surface, eyelid anatomy, tear film adequacy, underlying systemic or autoimmune diseases, and patient-related logistical and socioeconomic concerns. Special emphasis is placed on the importance of preoperative evaluation and counselling and the role of a multidisciplinary approach in achieving successful long-term outcomes. Drawing on current evidence and clinical experience, we propose a practical decision-making algorithm to aid ophthalmologists in selecting the most appropriate KPro tailored to individual patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.