ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Comparative study of the conservative and surgical treatment of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The mortality rate of spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage (SCH) is extremely high. Currently, only surgical treatment (ST) and conservative treatment (CT) methods are available; however, the indications for the treatment of SCH are not yet clear. In this study, we compared the outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment methods for patients with SCH and a hematoma volume of >10 mL. Methods: We retrospectively included patients with SCH who were treated in the Emergency Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, the Neurosurgery Department of the Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, and the Neurosurgery Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from April 2014 to January 2024. Patients were divided into CT group and ST group using a 1:2 stratified matching method based on hematoma volume and diameter. We collected baseline clinical characteristics of patients, including age, blood pressure, imaging data, complications, and prognosis, and conducted univariate analysis. After excluding factors with collinearity effects through collinearity diagnosis, we used a binary logistic regression model to analyze the independent correlation between good and poor prognosis. Results: Based on the inclusion criteria, 98 patients with SCH were screened, comprising 41 patients in the CT group and 57 patients in the ST group. Univariate analysis showed that the ST group had a higher proportion of patients with good prognosis at 1 and 3 months [41(71.9%) vs. 19(46.3%), Conclusion: When the bleeding volume of SCH patients is greater than 10 mL, surgery is an independent predictor of good short-term prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.