Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446880›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

The role of neuro-supportive substances of natural origin in neurological conditions-A literature-based formulators' perspective.

Roy van Brummelen, Anna C van Brummelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roy van BrummelenVan Brummelen Consultants, Pretoria, South Africa.
Anna C van BrummelenVan Brummelen Consultants, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Products of natural origin are seldom tested up to a point of full acceptance, mainly due to a lack of financial viability for commercialization. Yet many come with a rich history of use and proof of concept testing. We investigated literature regarding the possible role and function of the best known of these nutraceuticals in relationship to three neurological conditions i.e. stroke, Alzheimer's - (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), and their potential as supportive therapies. Current studies suggest that citicoline has a neuroprotective effect in ischemic conditions, playing a role in the restoration of the barrier function of endothelial cells, activating repair mechanisms and possibly decreasing ischemic lesion size in stroke, as well as increasing dopamine availability in PD. Citicoline was also demonstrated to increase the levels of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), thus reducing inflammation-leading to improved cognitive status and a better quality of life in cognitive impairment. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) shows pro-cognitive effects, increasing glutathione (GSH) levels that are decreased in AD and PD patients, possibly decreasing neuroinflammation. Mechanistic studies indicate the potential neuroprotective and neurorestorative effects of resveratrol by its anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic activity, also increasing SIRT1 levels and promoting the outgrowth of neurite protrusions and synaptogenesis. Curcumin's anti-inflammatory effects via inhibition of interleukin 1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) can potentially delay progression of PD. Some nutraceuticals, e.g., citicoline, show synergism in combination with current therapies. We propose a renewed, risk-benefit approach for inclusion of the investigated nutraceuticals with limited indications in certain neurological treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Alzheimer'santioxidantsciticolinecurcumininflammationParkinson'sresveratrolstroke

Identifiers

PMID41446880
PMCPMC12722915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.