ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2026
Measurement of Supraspinatus Tear Size Using Previously Acquired Ultrasound Images Obtained by Multiple Examiners.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Tear Propagation and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Personalized Exercise Therapy for Individuals With Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction/Purpose: One examiner might not be able to acquire and interpret every image when examining rotator cuff tears in large cohort studies due to logistical issues. The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of supraspinatus tear size measurements performed by multiple observers using previously acquired ultrasound images by a separate set of examiners. Methods: Seventy-two ultrasound examinations of individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were performed by five ultrasound examiners. Fifteen examinations were randomly chosen to be evaluated by three observers with varying amounts of ultrasound experience using repeated measurements. The maximum anterior-posterior tear size using these previously acquired ultrasound examinations was assessed and the repeatability and minimal detectable change were calculated. Results: The intra-observer repeatability was improved with greater experience to 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.95) but was 0.51 (95% CI 0.20-0.77) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-0.90) for observers with low experience. For all observers, the inter-observer repeatability was 0.32 (95% CI 0.00-0.65). For all observers, the minimal detectable change was 4.6 mm and was lower in observers with more experience. Discussion: Changes in supraspinatus tear size of 4.6 mm can be detected using previously acquired ultrasound images. This is comparable to ultrasound examinations performed and measured by the same individual as previously reported in the literature. Repeatability is poor among examiners with less experience. Conclusion: Clinical studies that cannot utilise measurements by a single examiner can be performed within current thresholds for determining changes in tear size of the supraspinatus tendon. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.