Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446869›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2026

Measurement of Supraspinatus Tear Size Using Previously Acquired Ultrasound Images Obtained by Multiple Examiners.

Christopher M Gibbs, Luke T Mattar, Satoshi Takeuchi, Robert T Tisherman, Adam J Popchak, Andrew C Cordle, James J Irrgang, Volker Musahl, Richard E Debski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher M GibbsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Luke T MattarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-837X
Satoshi TakeuchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Toyohashi Medical Center Toyohashi Aichi Japan.
Robert T TishermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Adam J PopchakDepartment of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Andrew C CordleDepartment of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
James J IrrgangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Volker MusahlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Richard E DebskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-3321

Funding

Predicting the Outcome of Exercise Therapy for Treatment of Rotator Cuff TearsR01AR069503 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Richard E Debski, JAMES JOHN IRRGANG · 2016 to 2026
$5.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: One examiner might not be able to acquire and interpret every image when examining rotator cuff tears in large cohort studies due to logistical issues. The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of supraspinatus tear size measurements performed by multiple observers using previously acquired ultrasound images by a separate set of examiners. Methods: Seventy-two ultrasound examinations of individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were performed by five ultrasound examiners. Fifteen examinations were randomly chosen to be evaluated by three observers with varying amounts of ultrasound experience using repeated measurements. The maximum anterior-posterior tear size using these previously acquired ultrasound examinations was assessed and the repeatability and minimal detectable change were calculated. Results: The intra-observer repeatability was improved with greater experience to 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.95) but was 0.51 (95% CI 0.20-0.77) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51-0.90) for observers with low experience. For all observers, the inter-observer repeatability was 0.32 (95% CI 0.00-0.65). For all observers, the minimal detectable change was 4.6 mm and was lower in observers with more experience. Discussion: Changes in supraspinatus tear size of 4.6 mm can be detected using previously acquired ultrasound images. This is comparable to ultrasound examinations performed and measured by the same individual as previously reported in the literature. Repeatability is poor among examiners with less experience. Conclusion: Clinical studies that cannot utilise measurements by a single examiner can be performed within current thresholds for determining changes in tear size of the supraspinatus tendon. Level of Evidence: III.

Indexed as

measurementrepeatabilityrotator cuff tearultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41446869
PMCPMC12722106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.