Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446838›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Case Report: Post-LASIK exacerbation of granular corneal dystrophy type 2: a familial case with

Longhao Kuang, Xuanjun Zhang, Yufang Wang, Qing Zhan, Jingjing Su, Baotao Lin, Ping Guo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Longhao Kuang *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xuanjun Zhang *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Yufang WangNanshan College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZhanShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Jingjing SuShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Baotao LinShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Ping GuoShenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Medical Center, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate that LASIK is contraindicated in patients with granular corneal dystrophy through documentation of post-surgical disease exacerbation. Methods: Comprehensive clinical evaluation including anterior segment photography and multimodal imaging were performed on the proband and affected family members. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples, and targeted sequence capture array technique followed by PCR and Sanger sequencing were employed for mutation identification. Results: The proband presented with bilateral progressive vision loss following LASIK surgery performed at age 18. Anterior segment photography revealed extensive granular opacification within the corneal stroma, predominantly at the LASIK flap interface. Genetic analysis identified a heterozygous c.371G > A mutation in exon 4 of the Conclusion: LASIK surgery significantly accelerates granular corneal dystrophy type 2 progression through multiple pathophysiological mechanisms. Comprehensive preoperative assessment incorporating genetic screening for

Indexed as

granular corneal dystrophy type 2lamellar keratoplastyLASIKrefractive surgery exacerbationTGFBI mutation

Identifiers

PMID41446838
PMCPMC12722859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.