ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A multi-modal prompt-tuning method of ultrasound diagnosis for thyroid nodule.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing using few-shot learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules using ultrasound images heavily depends on the clinical expertise of radiologists. This reliance poses significant challenges in underdeveloped countries and regions where access to specialized medical resources is limited. Recently, Multi-modal Large Language Models (M-LLMs) have demonstrated promising potential in handling heterogeneous data, such as images and text, making them attractive candidates for automating labor-intensive diagnostic tasks. However, M-LLMs often struggle in ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules for two main reasons: (1) without domain-specific fine-tuning, they are prone to generating hallucinated content, especially in classification tasks that demand expert-level decision-making; and (2) the cost and effort required for ultrasound multi-modal datasets of thyroid nodules are prohibitively high, which are essential for fine-tuning M-LLMs. Methods: We propose a novel multi-modal prompt-tuning method based on ultrasound images and textual description, which can assist radiologists in improving their diagnoses of the etiology of thyroid nodules. Our approach leverages an image encoder and a prompt-tuning framework to learn effective representations from both modalities without the need for expensive full model fine-tuning. The fused multi-modal features are then used to improve the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. These obtained features are re-input into the multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model to fuse multi-modal relationships for complementing image features and assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Results: Extensive experiments on publicly available and private enrolled datasets demonstrate that our method achieved state-of-the-art performance. Our method significantly outperformed traditional single-modality methods, with accuracy improvements of up to 40.62 over ResNet and 28.51% over AlexNet on the publicly available dataset. In contrast to other multi-modal models, our method achieved superior performance of up to 23.12% and 25.21% on accuracy and F1 score. Conclusions: Our method even surpasses all participating radiologists in accuracy, highlighting its strong potential to assist in expert-level diagnostic decision-making and provide scalable support for resource-limited clinical environments. Practically, it facilitates faster and more consistent thyroid nodule screening, thereby enhancing diagnostic efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.