Articlei-Perception
Pictorial spacecrafts - the Ames' Glass.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are various ways to evoke stereopsis without binocular disparities. Closing one eye, or looking through a synopter are well-known methods. Ames (1925) listed nine ways of generating this so-called ''plastic effect," one of which involves a cylindrically curved lens placed in front of one eye. We investigated qualitative perceptual effects of this particular way of viewing artworks. A total of 38 participants viewed three digitally reproduced paintings. Initially, they were asked to spontaneously report the perceptual effect of the lens. While being naive to the purpose of the experiment, 66% of the participants reported increased depth experience. In addition, participants reported increased contrast, color vibrancy, and material expression (e.g., increased shininess). During a second part of the experiment, we asked to report on seven qualities: depth, color, three-dimensional shape, realism, detail, light, and material. All qualities increased significantly except detail, which seemed to show idiosyncratic results: the majority of the observers experienced a decrease of detail, while a minority reported, surprisingly, an increase of detail. The results agree with previous qualitative accounts on monocular aperture viewing, despite relying on entirely different nonpictorial cues: monocular aperture viewing relies on the absence of vergence and binocular disparities, whereas the Ames' Glass relies on distorted binocular disparities while keeping vergence unchanged. Together with the synopter, for which qualitative data is lacking, the Ames Glass and monocular aperture viewing are pictorial spacecrafts fit for art gallery viewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.