Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41446815›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025

Navigating goals of care discussion in palliative care: A qualitative study applying Bourdieu's theory of practice.

Haiyang Lin, Shiyong Tan, Yufei Huang, Haojie Duan, Yumei Li, Yanping Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haiyang LinSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9524-1477
Shiyong TanSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, China.
Yufei HuangSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, China.
Haojie DuanSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, China.
Yumei LiDepartment of Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, China.
Yanping HaoSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5240-3129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, effective communication has become indispensable with the increasing prevalence of advanced life-limiting diseases. Goals of care discussion (GOCD) align care with patients' preferences and improve care quality. Objectives: This paper probes deep into the dilemmas and summarizes strategies of medical staff conducting GOCD from the viewpoint of human-environment interaction. Design: Qualitative study comprising semi-structured in-depth interviews. Methods: Eighteen medical staff (6 doctors, 12 nurses) were recruited from five palliative care units in Guangzhou, China, from December 2023 to March 2024. Data were analyzed by carrying out Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis and guided by Bourdieu's theory of practice. Results: Three themes and 11 sub-themes emerged: (1) The palliative care environment as a complex and sensitive field characterized by highly sensitive life-related issues, intricate ethical dilemmas, and ambiguous role responsibilities; (2) Multiple forms of capital employed in communication, including informational capital, economic capital, social capital, symbolic capital, and emotional capital; (3) Common communication habitus, including risk aversion, euphemistic expression, emotional restraint. Conclusion: By drawing on Bourdieu's theory of practice, this study offers revolutionary standpoints on the dilemmas in GOCD within palliative care, which underscores the significance of both individual and environmental factors. Grounded in these insights, we recommend implementing the following strategies: fostering a positive ethical climate and a conducive environment for open dialogue; enhancing ethical awareness and sensitivity through tailored training programs; clarifying relational frameworks to bolster team collaboration; improving communication approaches by leveraging diverse forms of capital; and proactively confronting implicit biases that persist in clinical settings.

Indexed as

communicationdecision-makingpatient care planningqualitative researchterminal care

Identifiers

PMID41446815
PMCPMC12722654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.