ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Impact of different doses of rivaroxaban on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study to assess the associations between different rivaroxaban doses and clinical outcomes in elderly NVAF patients in a real-world setting, and to explore factors influencing dose selection. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with NVAF and hospitalized at the Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou between 1 January 2022, and 31 December 2022. All patients received rivaroxaban therapy. Based on the prescribed dose, patients were categorized into a standard-dose group (15-20 mg/day) and a low-dose group (10 mg/day) groups based on the prescribed dose. Clinical outcomes within 12 months post-discharge were collected via follow-up, including readmission records and telephone interviews. Results: A total of 214 elderly patients with NVAF were included in the study. The mean age was 79.2 ± 8.2 years in the low-dose group and 75.4 ± 8.0 years in the standard-dose group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex (P = 0.298), CHA Conclusion: This retrospective study found that low-dose rivaroxaban was not significantly different from the standard dose in terms of thromboembolic events, bleeding, and all-cause mortality in elderly patients with NVAF. Although the safety profiles appeared similar between the two groups, the standard dose was associated with a higher cumulative survival rate in the unadjusted analysis. However, this observed survival difference may be influenced by baseline confounders, such as age and bleeding history. These findings suggest an association and support the need for further investigation into flexible anticoagulation strategies in clinical practice. Age, bleeding history, and renal function must be carefully considered when individualizing treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.